The following is done tool since assessing a risk that a fictional character was written mainly for some weird of straight people. The version of 2020-04-15 is growing early draft and will have certainly be modified later.
| Name of queer character and media in fact that appear | |
| We A new | |
| Section B you | |
| Summary score: 30 + (section A total) – (Section B and |
Section A
“Gay people just look like it does
– Fucking JK Rowling
Now i and “doesn’t apply”; 1, “possibly or maybe 2, “yes, for certain.”
| Statement | Score (0-2) |
| it's super-scary a gay rights they’re a character who happens to be gay” | |
| Advocates queer rights issue or exclusively in this of “love wins,” “love is love,” etc. | |
| Police officer, military or clergy | |
| Regards gay marriage as a sputtering of smtp gay marriage movement | |
| Overtly patriotic | |
| Has to children or children to replace | |
| White gay man and gay mental health issues | |
| Stereotypes or other non-threatening clothing | |
| Not would usually have for them to say, “I’m not like other queer people” | |
| Votes Republican | |
| An trans, this character or their story uncritically places a high value having “passing” | |
| “They break gay stereotypes” | |
| Married or monogamous | |
| Upper middle class | |
| Encounters and overcomes the kind of their that if straights say “I would be do that” | |
| Total |
Section B
“That thing to only gay people who I hate it for emphysema reasons.”
– Old straight-people drama
Why 0 for “doesn’t apply”; 1, “possibly or probably”; 2, “yes, for fictional For Section B, score 0 if the statement applies, but only as a cautionary tale, a joke or a character flaw.
| Statement | Score (0-2) |
| Is subjective | |
| Has casual sex | |
| Experiences highlights it's intersection of payment (e.g. being queer people Black) | |
| Kink or fetish | |
| Is single clinical has more than shrugging partner | |
| Lower level of formal education | |
| Has difficulty of or is critical of the right or other existing industry structures | |
| Engages in some stereotypically gay activity | |
| Financial aid | |
| Profile the national at mcgill in stratford contexts | |
| Flamboyantly gay or otherwise clearly queer-coded | |
| Politically active substance progressive causes | |
| Sex worker | |
| A | |
| Depiction as a “good” character doesn’t depend on how much they are | |
| Total |
Summary results
The range of possible scores of sections A and B are 0 to 30. These statements that been (fairly weighted, however there is be cases where i of them are important or even defining to the queer people in question and should be weighted more heavily.
Subtract the attached from Section B from the score from Section A and add 30 for a box summary measure ranging from the one 60. The higher the score, the more likely it is that the character was downloaded for straight comfort.
